Cent Eur J Nurs Midw 2017, 8(3):658-666 | DOI: 10.15452/CEJNM.2017.08.0016

EXTERNAL BREAST PROSTHESES IN POST-MASTECTOMY CARE IN GERMANY - WOMEN'S EXPERIENCES: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Regina Wiedemann*, Wilfried Schnepp
Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Germany

Aim: In Germany, external breast prostheses are recognized and funded as medical devices for adjustment and care following a mastectomy due to breast cancer. Nonetheless, there is a lack of awareness of the prostheses-fitting service in German breast centres and outpatient care. In this study breast cancer survivors give voice to their experiences.

Design: The study employs qualitative research evaluation methods.

Methods: Data was collected via semi-structured interviews. The analysis was carried out via open and axial coding.

Results: Women's experiences and requirements are presented in a two-phase model. Phase one describes their experiences of shock and crisis, and the subsequent initial prosthesis fitting in hospital. Phase two describes the women's desire for normality, which they hope to achieve with the help of a breast prosthesis.

Conclusion: The results confirm the consequences of losing a breast, the resulting distress, and the importance of a good-quality prosthesis for body image, femininity, and psychosocial well-being. The study confirms that a lack of information and choice in prosthesis fitting is a common problem. For the first time, the two-phase model demonstrates the differences between the initial hospital treatment and women's long-term needs.

Keywords: breast cancer, external breast prostheses, mastectomy, supportive care, qualitative research

Received: January 25, 2017; Accepted: May 22, 2017; Published: September 30, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Wiedemann R, Schnepp W. EXTERNAL BREAST PROSTHESES IN POST-MASTECTOMY CARE IN GERMANY - WOMEN'S EXPERIENCES: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2017;8(3):658-666. doi: 10.15452/CEJNM.2017.08.0016.
Download citation

References

  1. AOK-Bundesverband. Brustentfernung - Was kommt danach. Berlin; 2012. (in German)
  2. Deutsche Krebshilfe. Brustkrebs - Die blauen Ratgeber. Bonn; 2016. (in German)
  3. Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Senologie. Kennzahlenauswertung 2016. Jahresbericht der zertifizierten Brustkrebszentren. Kennzahlenjahr 2015 / Auditjahr 2014. Berlin; 2016. (in German)
  4. Dresing T, Pehl T. Praxisbuch interview, transkription & analyse. Anleitung und Regelsysteme für qualitativ Forschende. 5th ed. Marburg: Eigenverlag; 2013. (in German)
  5. Fitch MI, McAndrew A, Harris A, Anderson J, Kubon T, McClennen J. Perspectives of women about external breast prostheses. Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal. 2012;22(3):162-174. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Frauenselbsthilfe nach Krebs. Soziale Informationen. Bonn; 2013. (in German)
  7. Frauenselbsthilfe nach Krebs. Brustamputation - Wie geht es weiter? Informationen und Entscheidungshilfen für Brustkrebspatientinnen. Bonn; 2014. (in German)
  8. Gallagher P, Buckmaster A, OʼCarroll S, Kiernan G, Geraghty J. Experiences in the provision, fitting and supply of external breast prostheses: findings from a national survey. European Journal of Cancer Care (England). 2009;18(6):556-568. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Gallagher P, Buckmaster A, OʼCarroll S, Kiernan G, Geraghty, J. External breast prostheses in post-mastectomy care: womenʼs qualitative accounts. European Journal of Cancer Care (England). 2010;19(1):61-71. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Glaus SW, Carlson GW. Long-term role of external breast prostheses after total mastectomy. The Breast Journal. 2009;15(4):385-393. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Kuckartz U. Einführung in die computergestützte Analyse qualitativer Daten. 3th ed. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2010. (in German) Go to original source...
  12. Livingston PM, White VM, Roberts SB, Pritchard E, Gibbs A, Hill DJ. Access to breast prostheses via a governmentfunded service in Victoria, Australia. Experience of women and service providers. Evaluation Review. 2003;27(5):563- 568. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Livingston PM, White VM, Roberts SB, Pritchard E, Hayman J, Gibbs A, Hill DJ. Women's satisfaction with their breast prosthesis: what determines a quality prosthesis? Evaluation Review. 2005;29(1):65-83. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Münstedt K, Schüttler B, Milch W, Sachsse S, Zygmunt M, Kullmer U, Vahrson H. Epicutaneous breast forms. A new system promises to improve body image after mastectomy. Support Care Cancer. 1998;6(3):295-299. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Reichertz J. Objektive Hermeneutik und hermeneutische Wissenssoziologie. In: Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I, Hrsg. Qualitative Forschung. 9th ed. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, 2012. p. 514-524. (in German)
  16. Robert Koch-Institut und die Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland e. V. (GEKID). Krebs in Deutschland 2011/2012. 10th ed. Berlin; 2015. (in German)
  17. Roberts S, Livingston P, White V, Gibbs A. External breast prosthesis use: experiences and views of women with breast cancer, breast care nurses, and prosthesis fitters. Cancer Nursing. 2003;26(3):179-186. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Ruppel PS, Mey G. Arbeiten nach dem Peer-to-Peer-Prinzip in einer online-basierten Forschungsumgebung: Die NetzWerkstatt - Integrierte Methodenbegleitung für qualitative Qualifizierungsarbeiten. In: Günauer F, Krüger AK, Moes J, Steidten T, Koepernik C, Hrsg. GEWMaterialien aus Hochschule und Forschung 119: GEWHandbuch Promovieren mit Perspektive. Ein Ratgeber von und für DoktorandInnen. 2th upd. and rev. ed. Bielefeld: W. Bertelsmann Verlag (wbv), 2012;293-298. (in German)
  19. Rupprecht C, Schulte C. Onkologie-Report 2013. Zahlen und Fakten zu Krebserkrankungen in der Region; 2013. (in German)
  20. Thijs-Boer FM, Thijs JT, van de Wiel HB. Conventional or adhesive external breast prosthesis? A prospective study of the patientsʼ preference after mastectomy. Cancer Nursing. 2001;24(3):227-230. Go to original source...
  21. von Kardorff E. Qualitative Evaluationsforschung. In: Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I, Hrsg. Qualitative Forschung. 9th ed. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, 2012. p. 238-250. (in German)
  22. Wiedemann R, Schnepp W. Externe brustprothetische Versorgung nach Mastektomie: Bedürfnisse und Erfahrungen betroffener Frauen, Breast Care Nurses und Sanitätsfachangestellter - eine systematische Übersichtsarbeit. Pflegewissenschaft, 2016;9/10:454-468. doi:10.3936/1442. (in German) Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.