Cent Eur J Nurs Midw 2019, 10(2):1041-1051 | DOI: 10.15452/CEJNM.2019.10.0012

Validation of NANDA International diagnoses at an intensive care unit

Dagmar Šerková1,*, Jana Marečková2
1 Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic (student)
2 Department of Anthropology and Health Education, Faculty of Education, Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic

Aim: The aim of the study was to conduct content validation of selected NANDA International diagnoses for an Interdisciplinary Intensive Care Unit (IICU), and to identify the degree of diagnostic significance of their selected defining characteristics and relevant or risk factors.

Design: Descriptive study.

Methods: The set of NANDA International diagnoses and selected characteristics for validation was compiled using the following methods: 1) Content analysis of a form for planning nursing care at the IICU, Nový Jičín Hospital; 2) Literature search and selection of diagnoses from the studies found; and 3) Consensus between two experts. Subsequently, 32 nursing diagnoses with 100 defining characteristics, 72 related factors and 73 risk factors were included in the study (i.e., a total of 245 characteristic signs). The sample of clinical experts conducting the validation consisted of 17 general nurses from the participating department. Fehring's Diagnostic Content Validation (DCV) tool was used.

Results: Total DCV score > 0.6 was identified in 16 nursing diagnoses, while values below 0.6 were calculated for the same number of validated diagnoses. The number of major characteristics of diagnoses (DCV ≥ 0.80) was 28. The number of minor characteristics (DCV 0.79 - 0.51) was 176, while 41 nursing characteristics of nursing diagnoses were considered diagnostically insignificant (DCV < 0.5).

Conclusion: On the basis of the validation study results, 16 nursing NANDA International diagnoses with 102 valid diagnostic characteristics were recommended for nursing diagnostics in lucid adult patients at the IICU, Nový Jičín Hospital.

Keywords: adult patient, content validation, DCV model, intensive care, NANDA International, nursing diagnosis

Received: January 28, 2019; Accepted: May 26, 2019; Published: September 30, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Šerková D, Marečková J. Validation of NANDA International diagnoses at an intensive care unit. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2019;10(2):1041-1051. doi: 10.15452/CEJNM.2019.10.0012.
Download citation

References

  1. Bocková S, Marečková J, Zapletalová J. Content validation of the diagnosis Ineffective Breathing Pattern. Kontakt. 2015;17(1):e24-e31. Go to original source...
  2. Cabral VdeH, Andrade ÍRC, Melo EM, Cavalcante TdeMC. Prevalence of nursing diagnoses in an intensive care unit. Revista Rene. 2017;18(1):84-90. Go to original source...
  3. Castellan C, Sluga S, Spina E, Sanson G. Nursing diagnoses, outcomes and interventions as measures of patient complexity and nursing care requirement in intensive care unit. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2016;72(6):1273-1286. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. de Carvalho EC, Martins FT, Dalri MC, Canini SR, Laus AM, Bachion MM, Rossi LA. Relations between nursing data collection, diagnoses and prescriptions for adult patients at an intensive care unit. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. 2008;16(4):700-706. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Fehring JR. Validation diagnostic labels: standardized methodology. In: Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth conference. St. Louis: Mosby; 1986.
  6. Fehring JR. Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart and Lung.1987;16(6 Pt 1):625-629. Go to PubMed...
  7. Fehring JR. The Fehring Model. In: Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the tenth conference. 1st. ed. Philadelphia: Lipincot; 1994.
  8. Ferreira AM, da Rocha EdoN, Lopes CT, Bachion MM, Lopes JdeL, de Barros ALBL. Nursing diagnoses in intensive care: cross-mapping and NANDA-I taxonomy. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2016;69(2):285-293. Go to original source...
  9. Gordon M. Nursing diagnoses: process and application. 2nd ed. St. Luis: McGraw-Hill Inc.; 1987.
  10. Herdman TH, Kamitsuru S. Eds. NANDA International nursing diagnoses: definitions and classification, 2015-2017. Go to original source...
  11. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2014. Klugarová J, Klugar M, Marečková J, Hájek M. Methodology of systematic review development I: the effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on mortality in adults with craniotrauma. Czech and Slovak Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2015;78(5):555-561.
  12. Lucena AdeF, de Barros AL. Nursing diagnoses in a Brazilian intensive care unit. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 2006;17(3):139-146. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Oliveira N, Chianca T, Rassool GH. A Validation study of the nursing diagnosis Anxiety in Brazil. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 2008;19(3):102- 110. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Pompeo DA, Rossi LA, Paiva L. Content validation of the nursing diagnosis Nausea. Revista da Escola Enfermagem da USP. 2014;48(1):48-56. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Salgado PO, Chianca TCM. Identification and mapping of the nursing diagnoses and actions in an Intensive Care Unit. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. 2011;19(4):928- 935. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Santos CT, Almeida MdeA, Lucena AdeF. The nursing diagnosis of Risk for pressure ulcer: content validation. Revista Latino-Americana de. Enfermagem. 2016;24:e2693. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Vaněčková J, Sollár T, Vörösová G. Defining characteristics of the Nursing Diagnosis Anxiety: A Validation study. In: Present and the future of nursing and midwifery; proceedings for international conference. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita; 2012. p. 294-299.
  18. Vörösová G, Semanišiová M, Sollár T, Solgajová A. Validation of nursing diagnosis Acute confusion in selected settings. In: Present and the future of nursing and midwifery; proceedings for international conference. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita; 2012. p. 314-318.
  19. Zeleníková R, Žiaková K, Čáp J, Jarošová D, Vrublová Y. Návrh kritérií výberu expertov pre validizáciu ošetrovateľských diagnóz v ČR a SR. Kontakt. 2010;12(4):407-413. (in Slovak) Go to original source...
  20. Zeleníková R, Žiaková K, Vrublová Y, Jarošová D. Porovnanie výsledkov validizácie ošetrovateľskej diagnózy Akútna bolesť v ČR a SR. Ošetrovateľstvo: teória, výskum, vzdelávanie. 2011;1(1):12-19. (in Slovak)
  21. Zeleníková R, Žiaková K. Obsahová validácia ošetrovateľskej diagnózy Deficit objemu telových tekutín. Ošetřovatelství a porodní asistence. 2012;3(4):475-483. (in Slovak)
  22. Zeleníková R, Žiaková K, Čáp J, Jarošová D. Content validation of the nursing diagnosis Acute pain in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge. 2014;25(3):139-146. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.